跨国务工逐渐成为农村家庭快速致富的选择途径之一。文章采用个案访谈法,以山东省J县的农村已婚出国劳工的家庭为研究对象,从“家本位”视角出发,对已婚出国劳工的家庭功能失衡及其逻辑进行探究。在贫困与经济诱惑的双重背景之下,J县许多农村家庭形成了“经济理性”至上的价值观。这种价值观通过“家本位”思想,使所有家庭成员都服从于家庭整体经济利益的实现,参与到跨国务工的过程中,由此家庭经济功能压倒家庭其他功能,占据了绝对重要的地位,而家庭其他功能,包括性生活功能、生育功能、教育功能、抚养和赡养功能,以及情感交流功能,则被弱化甚至忽视。从长远来看,家庭经济至上的功能会产生两种效应:促进效应和破裂效应,前者可以有效弥补家庭其他功能弱化的影响,增强“家本位”观念,后者会导致家庭破裂,侵蚀“家本位”观念。
Abstract
Working abroad has been one of the choices for rural families to become rich quickly. This study adopts the method of case interviews, and takes the families of rural married labors working abroad in J county in Shandong province as the research object, aiming to explore the status quo and the logic of family functions imbalances of rural married labors working abroad from family standard. The research indicates that under the background of poverty and economic temptation, many rural families in J county form the values of the supremacy of "economic rationality", which makes all family members subject to the whole family economic interests and involved in the process of cross-border flow through the family standard, thus family economic function overwhelms other family functions, and plays an absolutely important role, while other family functions, including sexual function, fertility function, education function, raising and support functions, as well as emotional communication function, are weakened and even ignored. The emphasis on family economic function can give rise to two effects: promoting effect and broken effect. The former can effectively remedy the influences caused by reduction of other family functions and strengthen the value of family standard, while the latter can lead to family breakdown and erode the value of family standard.
关键词
家本位 /
跨国务工 /
经济理性 /
家庭功能失衡 /
两种效应
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
family standard /
working abroad /
economic rationality /
family functions imbalances /
two effects
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 邓伟志,徐新.家庭社会学导论[M].上海:上海大学出版社, 2006.
[2] 李菁.现代家庭功能弱化的道德后果及学校教育应对[J].思想理论教育,2009(2):4-8.
[3] 潘泽泉.现代家庭功能的变迁趋势研究[J].学术交流,2005(1):129-132.
[4] 杨菊华,何炤华.社会转型过程中家庭的变迁与延续[J].人口研究,2014(2):36-51.
[5] 王学义,廖煜娟.迁移模式对已婚农民工家庭功能的影响——基于家庭亲密度与适应性的视角[J].城市问题,2013(6):90-98.
[6] 任焰,潘毅.跨国劳动过程的空间政治:全球化时代的宿舍劳动体制[J].社会学研究,2006(4):21-33.
[7] 沈原.社会转型与工人阶级的再形成[J].社会学研究,2006(2):13-36.
[8] SASSEN, SASKIA. The Mobility of Labor and Capital: A Study in International Investment and Labor Flow[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1988.
[9] MORAWSKA EWA. The sociology and historiography of immigration[M]∥ Immigration Reconsidered: History, Sociology, and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
[10]刘晓虹.从群体原则到整体主义——中国传统价值体系中的群己观探析[J].文史哲,2002(4):112-119.
[11]洪良友.“家本位”文化与法律实现的关系探讨[J].研究生法学,2009(6):81-87.
[12]杨善华.中国当代城市家庭变迁与家庭凝聚力[J].北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2011(2):150-158.
[13]苗鹏.浅析整体主义[J].改革与开放,2012(14):120.
[14]赵孟营.新家庭社会学[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,2000.
[15]J·罗斯·埃什尔曼.家庭导论[M].潘允康,张文宏,等,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.13.
[16]夏剑豸,王秀花,张李玺,等.现代家庭学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1990:99.
[17]J县商务局多措并举扎实推进涉外劳务工作[EB/OL].(2013-09-17). http://www.juxian.gov.cn/ctnshow.php/aid/4023.
[18]TACOLI C. Migrating "For the Sake of the Family?" Gender, Life Course and Intra-Household Relations among Filipino Migrants in Rome [J].Philippine Sociological Review, 1996(44):12-32.
[19]大卫·切尔.家庭生活的社会学[M].北京:中华书局,2005:37.
[20]梁静,赵玉芳,谭力.农村留守儿童家庭功能状况及其影响因素研究[J].中国学校卫生,2007(7):631-633.
[21]方晓义,徐洁,孙莉,等.家庭功能:理论、影响因素及其与青少年社会适应的关系[J].心理科学进展,2004(4):544-553.
[22]刘兴花.性别视角下已婚女性赴日打工家庭策略研究[J].青年研究,2015(6):82-90.
[23]杨善华.“家本位”观念缓解代际关系[N].人民日报,2010-07-29.
[24]杨善华,贺常梅.责任伦理与城市居民的家庭养老——以“北京市老年人需求调查”为例[J].北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2004(1):71-84.
[25]CHAN KWOK-BUN. The migrant family drama,in Chinese Identities, Ethnicity and Cosmopolitanism[M].London: Routledge Press,2009.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(1258 KB)
