In the position of modernity criticism, Adorno and Lotman are Marxist-dialectical thinking-oriented, breaking homogeneity and propagating dissimilarity, to question and subversion of enlightenment modernity. In practice strategy, Adornos negative aesthetic inheritance of Marx negative criticism of narrative style, builds aesthetic utopia in radical way. Lotmans differential aesthetics stresses Marxs dialectical thinking of equality, tolerance, open nature in order to seek common ground among dissimilarities and search for accommodation within Pluralism. Combing these two types of thinking resources not only contributes to a more clear and comprehensive recognition of the inherent contradictions and conflicts of modernity, but also activates the Marxist dialectical thinking to explain the theoretical vitality of contemporary issues in modernity reflection context.
Key words
modernity /
criticism /
Adorno /
Lotman
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 阿多诺.否定的辩证法[M].张峰, 译.重庆:重庆出版社,1993.
[2] 阿多诺.美学理论[M].王柯平, 译.成都:四川人民出版社,1998.
[3] 冯宪光.西方马克思主义文艺美学思想[M].成都:四川大学出版社,1988.
[4] 马丁·杰.阿多诺[M].瞿铁鹏, 等, 译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1992.
[5] 洛特曼.艺术文本的结构[M].王坤, 译.广州:中山大学出版社,2003.
[6] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集: 第2卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1972.
[7] 赵毅衡.符号学文学论文集[M].天津:百花文艺出版社,2004.
[8] JURI M.LOTMAN.Universe of the Mind:A Semiotic Theory of Cculture[M].translated by Ann Shukman.Bloomington: Indianan University Press,1990.
[9] JONATHAN CULLER.Literary Theory[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1997.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}
Footnotes
{{custom_fn.content}}