Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno,Trans: ZHAO Yong,Proofreader: ZHAO Tianshu
Journal of Guangzhou University(Social Science Edi. 2020, 19(6): 6-18.
Abstract (
)
Download PDF (
)
Knowledge map
Save
Committed art and autonomous art each have their own strengths as well as their respective weaknesses: The former negates art′s detachment from reality, while the latter denies its connection to reality. Sartre′s philosophy takes the path of extreme subjectivism. All that is kept of his " choice" is therefore the abstract authority of the choice enjoined. And " freedom" becomes empty assertion. The extension of this philosophy to literature makes his commitment removed from the objective requirements of the work, also changes his plays into vehicles for what the author wants to say, becoming complicit in the culture industry. What Brecht is greater than Sartre is that he wanted his drama to educate spectators to a thoughtful attitude. But his drama theory ended up with a didactic poésie. Due to the pursuit of political commitment and the disdain for various mediations, the theory and practice of Brecht suffer from an alienating infantilism; and as a result of pursuing the aesthetic principle of simplification or technique of reduction, his construction of the social and economic contexts is so simple that his theater eventually proves false. Thus, Brecht′s plays often have their own defects the aesthetic form defiled by political untruth frequently turns his work to illustrated primer. As a result, political flaws become artistic flaws, and vice versa. The statement that " it is barbaric to continue to write poetry after Auschwitz" should not be softened. But Enzensberger′ s rejoinder also remains true, because literature must resist this verdict. The protest against the world is reflected in Kafka and Beckett. They explode art from the inside, and such art in turn is of great aggressiveness; whereas pro claimed commitment only subjugates art from the outside. It′s flashy and unrealistic, degenerating into handicrafts ultimately. The question of commitment has taken different forms in French and German because of their disparate cultural traditions. Aesthetically, the principle of l′art pour l′art has been dominant in the former. This is why the appeal to commitment sounded revolutionary there; in terms of the cultural tradition of the latter, the work of art is to be nothing for itself, otherwise it inspires effeminacy and discourages action. So encouraging commitment is rather misplaced.