刑事速裁程序的效率分析—以“成本—收益”为视角

李 彬

PDF(1235 KB)
PDF(1235 KB)
广州大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1) : 92-98.
法学

刑事速裁程序的效率分析—以“成本—收益”为视角

  • 李 彬
作者信息 +

Analysis of Efficiency of the Criminal Expeditious Procedure—from the Perspective of ″Csts-earnings″

  • LI Bin
Author information +
History +

摘要

以“成本—收益”为视角,分析了刑事速裁程序在提升诉讼效率方面的优势和不足。刑事速裁程序节约了审查起诉和审判环节的时间人力物力成本,保障了犯罪嫌疑人的人身权利和基本诉讼权利;但存在着提升侦查环节的效率非常有限,量刑标准操作性不强,保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的法律帮助权、知情权不到位等不足。应采取保障好犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的诉讼权利,完善刑事速裁案件处理的标准,建立刑事速裁案件快速办理机制,原则上实行一审终审制,加快智慧法院建设等措施来提升刑事速裁程序的效率。

Abstract

The criminal expeditious procedure has played a certain role in promoting the ″division of complicated and simple of criminal cases″,solving the contradiction of ″multiple cases and fewer people″ and improving the efficiency of criminal proceedings, but it has not yet achieved the desired results. The main reason is that the efficiency of criminal expeditious procedures is relatively limited, which makes it difficult for litigating party to ″jointly choose″ the application of the criminal expeditious procedures. From the perspective of ″costs-ownings″, this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of criminal expeditious procedures to improve litigation efficiency, and proposes to further protect the litigant′s and defendants′ litigation rights, improve the standards for handling criminal expeditious cases, establish the quick-fix mechanism for criminal expeditious cases,implement the first-instance final review system, and speed up the construction of the wisdom court, so as to improve the efficiency value of the criminal expeditious procedure to the litigating party, and give full play to the role of the criminal expeditious procedure in improving litigation efficiency.

关键词

刑事速裁程序 / 诉讼成本 / 诉讼收益 / 刑拘直诉

Key words

expeditious procedures / litigation costs / litigation incomes / direct prosecution during criminal detention

引用本文

导出引用
李 彬. 刑事速裁程序的效率分析—以“成本—收益”为视角. 广州大学学报(社会科学版). 2019, 18(1): 92-98
LI Bin. Analysis of Efficiency of the Criminal Expeditious Procedure—from the Perspective of ″Csts-earnings″. Journal of Guangzhou University (Social Science Edition). 2019, 18(1): 92-98

参考文献

[1] 原立荣.刑事速裁程序实证研究—以C市J区为分析样本[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1):67-73.
[2] 顾培东.效益:当代法律的一个基本价值目标—兼评西方法律经济学[J].中国法学,1992(1):89-98.
[3] 刘方权.刑事速裁程序试点效果实证研究[J].国家检察官学院学报,2018,26(2):97-122+174-175.
[4] 詹旋江.福建刑事速裁程序试点工作成效显著[N].人民法院报,2016-07-25(1).
[5] 郭玉.审判视野下“有效认罚”的作出及规制—以广州市Y区法院认罪认罚案件为样本[G]∥广东省法学会诉讼法学研究会2018年年会论文集.广州:广东省法学会诉讼法研究会,2018.
[6] 刘泊宁.论刑事诉讼阶段之跨越式发展—刑事速裁程序构建的另一种思考[J].法学,2017(9):168-179.
[7] 李本森.刑事速裁程序试点研究报告—基于18个试点城市的调查问卷分析[J].法学家,2018(1):165-178+196.
[8] 蔡长春.宽严相济“简”程序不“减”权利[EB/OL].(2016-09-05)[2018-07-02].http:∥legal.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0905/c42510-28690491.html.
[9] 汪建成.以效率为价值导向的刑事速裁程序论纲[J].政法论坛,2016,34(1):119-124.
[10]潘金贵,李冉毅.规则与实效:刑事速裁程序运行的初步检视[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,39(6):104-110.

[11]陈瑞华.论刑事诉讼的全流程简化—从刑事诉讼纵向构造角度的分析[J],华东政法大学学报,2017,20(4):13-21.
[12]李卫红.认罪认罚处理机制研究[J].山东警察学院学报,2017,29(2):5-11.
[13]吴笋林.广州法院3年共宣告21名被告人无罪[N].南方都市报,2017-08-22(6).
[14]沙雪良.18市拟试点认罪认罚从宽制度[EB/OL].(2016-08-30)[2018-06-02].http:∥www.chinanews.com/sh/2016/08-30/7987980.shtml.
[15]方俊民. 从宽从简:刑事速裁程序实行一审终审制可行性分析—以认罪认罚从宽制度的二维属性为视角[G]∥最高人民法院.深化司法改革与行政审判实践研究(上)—全国法院第28届学术讨论会获奖论文集.北京:最高人民法院,2017:11.
PDF(1235 KB)

113

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/