城市社会韧性是城市韧性的重要组成部分,与城市关键设施的韧性相比,社会韧性的形成需要更为复杂的跨边界活动。以合作共治为导向的社会治理变革试图从总体国家安全的角度提升社会化解和应对风险的能力。城市社会的韧性治理需要适应风险弥散的特征,在政府和社会之间、公共部门之间、线上和线下之间开展边界连接和联合行动以提升社会韧性。边界沟通、边界组织和边界对象有效地弥合了行动主体间的差异点。多元主体借助数字技术构建常态合作伙伴关系,在突发任务的激活下产生多重自主响应网络,满足应对多类型社会风险的需求,资源共享和共同行动提升了城市应对社会风险的韧性。边界视角的分析细化了社会韧性的形成过程,并为城市韧性治理提供了更为丰富的工具集。
Abstract
Urban social resilience is an important component of urban resilience. In contrast to the resilience of key urban facilities, the formation of social resilience requires more complex cross-boundary activities. The social governance reform guided by collaborative governance aims to enhance society′s capacity to mitigate and respond to risks from the perspective of overall national security. Urban social resilience governance needs to adapt to the characteristics of risk dispersion by conducting boundary connections and joint actions between government and society, among public sectors, and between online and offline domains to enhance social resilience. Boundary communication, boundary organizations, and boundary objects effectively reconcile the differences among actors. By leveraging digital technologies, diverse social entities can establish routine partnerships and generate multiple autonomous response networks under the activation of sudden emergencies. This meets the needs of addressing various types of social risks. Boundary perspective analysis elaborates the formation process of social resilience and provides a richer toolkit for urban resilience governance.
关键词
社会韧性 /
韧性城市 /
边界管理 /
合作治理
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
social resilience /
resilient city /
boundary coordination /
collaborative governance
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 朱正威,刘莹莹,杨洋.韧性治理:中国韧性城市建设的实践与探索[J].公共管理与政策评论,2021(3):22-31.
[2] 黄弘,范维澄.构建“安全韧性城市”:概念、理论与实施路径[J].北京行政学院学报,2024(2):1-9.
[3] ZOU Y H.Urban resilience,digital technologies,and the economic recovery of a city from the pandemic[J].Public Administration Review,2024,84(4):637-650.
[4] BEILIN R,WILKINSON C.Introduction:governing for urban resilience[J].Urban Studies,2015,52(7):1205-1217.
[5] HOLLING C S.Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J].Annual Review of Ecology,Evolution,and Systematics,1973,4:1-23.
[6] UNGAR M.Multisystemic resilience:adaptation and transformation in contexts of change[M].New York,NY:Oxford University Press,2021:7.
[7] 周利敏.从社会脆弱性到社会生态韧性:灾害社会科学研究的范式转型[J].思想战线,2015(6):50-57.
[8] 陈涛,罗强强.韧性治理:城市社区应急管理的因应与调适——基于W市J社区新冠肺炎疫情防控的个案研究[J].求实,2021(6):83-95.
[9] 詹承豫,高叶,徐明婧.系统韧性:一个统筹发展与安全的核心概念[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2022(4):17-32.
[10] ANSELL C,TRONDAL J.Governing turbulence:an organizational-institutional agenda[J].Perspectives on Public Management and Governance,2018(1):43-57.
[11] 周利敏,原伟麒.迈向韧性城市的灾害治理——基于多案例研究[J].经济社会体制比较,2017(5):22-33.
[12] BARDACH E.Getting agencies to work together:the practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship[M].Washington,DC:Brookings Institution,1998:116.
[13] 文军.回到“不确定性”:社会风险研究的范式反变[J].浙江学刊,2023(3):103-113.
[14] BRYSON J M,CROSBY B C,STONE M M.Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations:needed and challenging[J].Public Administration Review,2015,75(5):647-663.
[15] O′LEARY R,AMSLER L B.The collaborative public manager:new ideas for the twenty-first century[M].Washington,D.C.:Georgetown University Press,2009:3-4.
[16] 蔡长昆.合作治理研究述评[J].公共管理与政策评论,2017(1):85-96.
[17] QUICK K S,FELDMAN M S.Boundaries as junctures:collaborative boundary work for building efficient resilience[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2014,24(3):673-695.
[18] AGRANOFF R,MCGUIRE M.Collaborative public management:new strategies for local governments[M].Washington D.C.:Georgetown University Press,2003:101.
[19] PROVAN K G,LEMAIRE R H.Core concepts and key ideas for understanding public sector organizational networks:using research to inform scholarship and practice[J].Public Administration Review,2012,72(5):638-648.
[20] ABBOTT A.Things of boundaries[J].Social Research,1995(62):857-882.
[21] WATSON-MANHEIM M B,CHUDOBA K M,CROWSTON K.Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work[J].Information Systems Journal,2012,22(1):29-52.
[22] 谢菊兰,宋娅,骆亚,等.边界理论在组织行为学研究中的应用[J].中国人力资源开发,2022(4):127-140.
[23] TILLY C.Social boundary mechanisms[J].Philosophy of the Social Sciences,2004,34(2):211-236.
[24] FELDMAN M S,KHADEMIAN A M,INGRAM H,et al.Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices[J].Public Administration Review,2006,66(s1):89-99.
[25] 陈玉梅,李康晨.国外公共管理视角下韧性城市研究进展与实践探析[J].中国行政管理,2017(1):137-143.
[26] WILDAVSKY A B.Searching for safety[M].New Brunswick,USA:Transaction Books,1988:6.
[27] GODSCHALK D R.Urban hazard mitigation:creating resilient cities[J].Natural Hazards Review,2003,4(3):136-143.
[28] WEICK K E,SUTCLIFFE K M.Managing the unexpected:assuring high performance in an age of complexity[M].San Francisco,CA:Jossey-Bass,2007:117.
[29] ALLEN T W.Confronting complexity and creating unity of effort:the leadership challenge for public administrators[J].Public Administration Review,2012,72(3):320-321.
[30] GOLDSTEIN B E.Collaborative resilience:moving through crisis to opportunity[M].Cambridge,MA.:MIT Press,2012:3.
[31] YIN R K.Case study research:design and methods[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publications,2014:40-41.
[32] 王宁.代表性还是典型性?——个案的属性与个案研究方法的逻辑基础[J].社会学研究,2002(5):123-125.
[33] 郁建兴,周幸钰.超越技术赋能:数字化改革中的治理模式重塑何以可能[J].学术月刊,2023(11):73-83.
[34] BOIN A,RHINARD M.Managing transboundary crises:what role for the european union?[J].International Studies Review,2008,10(1):1-26.
[35] 文军,陈雪婧.社区协同治理中的转译实践:模式、困境及其超越——基于行动者网络理论的分析[J].社会科学,2023(1):141-152.
[36] FISHER R,URY W,PATTON B.Getting to yes:negotiating agreement without giving in[M].New York,NY:Penguin,2011:110.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(23&ZD142)
{{custom_fund}}
PDF(1486 KB)
